Mary Pierce vs Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L L L L W L
Form
W L W L W W L L L LHead To Head: Pierce 3 - 0 Pitkowski-Malcor
They have played 7 sets in total, with Pierce winning 6 and Pitkowski-Malcor winning 1. The last match between Pierce and Pitkowski-Malcor was at the Seat Open - Luxembourg, 26-10-1998, Second, Carpet with Mary Pierce getting the victory 4-6 6-1 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mary Pierce | 3 |
| Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | 0 |
Seat Open - Luxembourg(26-10-1998)
4
6
6
1
6
3
| Pierce | Stats | Pitkowski-Malcor |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 3 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 50 | Age | 49 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 14 | Titles | 1 |
| 68% (514-238) | Career Total W/L | 49% (92-96) |
| $1,195,535 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Altmaier VS Jarry PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Andreeva VS Bouzkova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Pierce VS Pitkowski-Malcor H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-1 6-3 | |||||
| 6-1 6-2 | |||||
| 6-3 7-5 | |||||
Pierce VS Pitkowski-Malcor H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 41 | Games Won | 21 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mary Pierce Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Vera Zvonareva
Player
Mary Pierce
52%
(
38 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-6 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mary Pierce
Player
Ai Sugiyama
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
47%
(
40 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
47 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katarina Srebotnik
Player
Mary Pierce
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
4
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
53)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jelena Jankovic
Player
Mary Pierce
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
11 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
75)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alona Bondarenko
Player
Mary Pierce
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
7
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Na Li
Player
Mary Pierce
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
74%
(
65 of
88)
9
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mary Pierce
Player
Eva Birnerova
77%
(
55 of
71)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
10
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mary Pierce
Player
Elena Vesnina
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
66)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
17%
(
7 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
40
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maria Sharapova
Player
Mary Pierce
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Mary Pierce
Player
Emma Laine
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-7(4) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 1-6 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68% (514/238) | Win/Loss | 49% (92/96) |
| 66% (1101/572) | Sets Win/Loss | 48% (211/225) |
| 57% (8563/6389) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (1908/1991) |
| 69% (195/87) | Hard Win/Loss | 41% (25/36) |
| 69% (176/79) | Clay Win/Loss | 55% (42/34) |
| 63% (99/57) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (19/16) |
| 69% (22/10) | Grass Win/Loss | 38% (6/10) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 196 | Aces Total | 0 |
| 0.01 | Double Faults Per Game | 0 |
| 102 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 286.41 | Average Opponent Rank | 306.69 |
| 67% (2814/4181) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 68% (1877/2753) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (690/1353) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (215/470) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 44% (1669/3817) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 73% (124/46) | Slam W/L | 35% (11/20) |
| 65% (61/33) | Masters W/L | 30% (6/14) |
| 62% (16/10) | Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 65% (122/66) | Main Tour W/L | 55% (74/61) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 78% (28/8) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 80% (20/5) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 69% (513/742) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (92/188) |
| 17% (1/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (56/107) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (15/25) |
| 59% (99/168) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (33/60) |
| 91% (515/469) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (91/74) |
| 9% (515/46) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (91/17) |
| 19% (237/46) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (97/18) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
